🔗 Share this article

Loved ones whose relatives buried in resting places vulnerable to coastal erosion argue that indecision on how best to address the problem is causing them avoidable anguish about the final resting places of their loved ones.

A Looming Threat to Historic Churchyards

Local authorities have singled out three burial grounds in the communities of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being in danger of being engulfed by the ocean in the coming decades.

A newly published study on the issue sets out a series of possible actions, from doing nothing to disinterring bodies and reburying them in more secure sites. Officials say it is for local people to determine how to move forward.

“At the moment we’re in limbo. It upsets me. They intended this to be their last home, but it won't be because of the sea.”

Projections suggest at least a portion of one churchyard could be claimed by the waves in the next 80 years, but some residents fear it will happen much sooner. “I think it’s got less than 20 years, if you consider what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Haunted by the Past

One resident recalled a school trip to the neighbouring village of Eccles, which has almost entirely disappeared into the sea, along with its place of worship and burial ground.

“It was possible to see people’s bones,” she said. “Some have this romantic idea that the deceased will just get carried away to the ocean. That is not the case. People will take bones as mementos and go plundering graves looking for valuables. It’s completely disrespectful.”

“I fear that the identical fate that happened at Eccles will happen here and there’ll be skeletons on the shore. I’d be disgusted by that.”

A Paratrooper's Grave in Jeopardy

Along the shoreline lies the grave of a ex-soldier who died while serving abroad. His mother expressed she lost sleep after discovering her child's final plot might one day be moved.

“It does disturb me to think this won’t be his permanent home,” she said. “For us it’s an important place to go.”

In her view, new interments should stop but says it is premature to exhume existing graves. “What I would choose for now is to do nothing and closely monitor, but an timely resolution must be made when a critical moment has been attained.”

Searching for Answers and Clarity

The lack of agreement over the timing and method to tackle the challenge has resulted in bereaved families feeling frustrated and anxious.

Some are calling for more coastal protections to slow the inevitable erosion and to permit burials to proceed for now. Different voices contend the moment for relocation is drawing near.

“The situation is very emotional,” a family member stated. “The official study was thorough, but now there’s confusion about how it is implemented. And all parties is avoiding responsibility over who is responsible.”

A local official said the burial sites were under the care of the local diocese. “In the end it is up to them to decide the path to take. We are here to assist them through that process with communities.”

It was also stated there was ample time to consider all the options. “We are talking decades before it begins getting lost.”

“There is no unified opinion on what should be done yet. It requires productive local conversations to find the right answers for each village.”

The possibility of the loss of the historic sites was labeled one of “immense sadness for the area,” but church representatives also referenced a belief in resurrection, providing a theological viewpoint on the physical disappearance of sacred ground.